Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Garrison v. Maryland Baltimore Co. BCDC et al
as 1:2020cv02381
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrison
Defendant:
Prime Care Health, Inc., Aramark Food Company and Maryland Baltimore Co. BCDC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bradford Allen v. Buddy Harwood
as 18-6223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRADFORD D VOL ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
BUDDY HARWOOD, Sheriff of Madison County (and Jail), MICHAEL GARRISON, Chief of the Madison County Sheriff's Office and TOMMY WORLEY, Correctional Officer at the Madison County Jail
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
David Foley v. Bruce Landgraf, et al
as 13-1911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID P. FOLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE J. LANDGRAF, ANDREW GARRISON, MICHAEL GARRISON and others
Foley v. Landgraf et al
as 2:2012cv01000
Plaintiff:
David Phillip Foley
Defendant:
Bruce J Landgraf, Andrew Garrison, Michael Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv14259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garrison et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv10231
Plaintiff:
Michael Garrison, George Davis, Ernie Jones and others
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Patricia Caruso, Michael Martin and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Garrison #237608 v. Palmer et al
as 1:2009cv00023
Petitioner:
Michael Garrison #237608
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer, Michigan Parole Board, James Atterberry and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garrison v. Palmer et al
as 2:2008cv15164
Petitioner:
Michael Garrison
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer, Michigan Parole Board, James Atterberry and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
State Treasurer v. Garrison et al
as 2:2008cv13018
Plaintiff:
State Treasurer
Defendant:
Michael Garrison and Edwin Carson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
