Cases 31 - 40 of 47
United States of America v. Hardy (Thomas)
as 13-3161
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Preston Hardy, AKA Peanut, James Glover, AKA Tone, Michael Glover, AKA Mike-Mike and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Shawn Thomas
Glover v. Bennett
as 2:2013cv02182
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover
Defendant:
Scott Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Michael Glover
as 13-2296
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Glover, also known as Born Taleem Bey
United States of America v. Hardy
as 13-1075
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Preston Hardy, James Glover, AKA Tone, Terrance Gonzalez, AKA Gucci, AKA Geeze and others
Defendant - Appellant:
James Hardy, AKA Light, Terrell Lucas, AKA Ruger Rell and Michael Glover, AKA Mike-Mike
Glover v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al
as 3:2009cv14508
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover
Defendant:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA, Inc., Lorillard Tobacco Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
United States of America v. Hardy (Glover)
as 13-743
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Preston Hardy, AKA Peanut, James Glover, AKA Tone, Brandon Williams, AKA Big Boy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Glover, AKA Mike-Mike and Terrell Lucas, AKA Ruger Rell
United States of America v. Hardy (Lucas)
as 12-4840
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Preston Hardy, AKA Peanut, James Glover, AKA Tone, Michael Glover, AKA Mike-Mike and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Terrell Lucas, AKA Ruger Rell
Glover v. Greenman et al
as 1:2011cv09122
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover
Defendant:
David Greenman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sealed Defendant 5 v. USA
as 7:2011cv00174
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Glover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
