Cases 1 - 10 of 33
HALE v. INDIANA STATE REFORMATORY et al
as 1:2023cv02226
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HALE
Defendant:
INDIANA STATE REFORMATORY, MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald v. Pearson, et al
as 23-1288
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARON ANTONIO DONALD
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. PEARSON, Dentist, MARK FAIRBAIRN, Warden, LINDSAY GOUTY, H.S.A. and others
HALE v. REIGLER et al
as 1:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HALE
Defendant:
KRISTINA REIGLER, GEO GROUP INC., CENTURION HEALTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HALE v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02036
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HALE
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC and MARITAL KNIESER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald v. Pearson et al
as 1:2022cv01312
Plaintiff:
LaRon Antonio Donald
Defendant:
Doug Pearson, Mark Fairbairn, Linsday Gouty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CLARK et al
as 2:2021cv04924
Plaintiff:
MS. KIMBERLY BROWN and KIMBERLY BROWN
Defendant:
MAYOR MAURICE CLARK, SR., OFFICER DONALD QUICK, OFFICER MICHAEL HALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry v. Garnett et al
as 3:2021cv00174
Defendant:
Tom Lynch, Curtis Jones, Officer Strickler and others
Plaintiff:
Camilia T Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv04523
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Michael Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Hale v. Mark Brnovich
as 18-16556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HALE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General
HALE v. WARDEN
as 2:2018cv00180
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HALE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
