Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Rucker v. Hinds County Public Defender's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00483
Plaintiff:
Mario T. Rucker
Defendant:
Hinds County Public Defender's Office, Attorney Alison O. Kelly and Attorney Michael Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hearn v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry Hearn
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hearn v. MTC
as 3:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry Hearn
Defendant:
MTC
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
U.S. Bank National Association, v. Freshour et al
as 4:2021cv02705
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Trustee for RMAC Trust, Series 2018G -CTT and U.S. Bank National Association,
Defendant:
Melissa Marie Freshour, Samantha Marie Rodriguez, Michael Henry Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hearn v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 1:2020cv00097
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and Marshall Turner
Petitioner:
Michael Henry Hearn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hearn v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2020cv00023
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry Hearn
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Henry v. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
as 2:2019cv14041
Defendant:
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Shaun Michael Henry and Shaun Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McConnell et al v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv08305
Defendant:
Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi US Services Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Henry and Misti McConnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Hearn v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 15-60238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HENRY HEARN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS and CECIL MCCRORY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
