Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Sines et al v. Kessler et al
as 3:2017cv00072
Defendant:
Matthew Heimbach, Nationalist Front, Augustus Sol Invictus and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 3, Marissa Blair, John Doe and others
Petitioner:
David Duke, James Hart Stern, Denise Y. Lunsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HILL v. LEE et al
as 2:2014cv01494
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HILL
Defendant:
THOMAS LEE and SEPTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00147
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Olson v. Sprint Communications Company, L.P. et al
as 6:2013cv01886
Plaintiff:
Shelly Rose Olson
Defendant:
Sprint Communications Company, L.P., Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Sprectrum, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
O'Laughlin v. City of Pittsfield, et al
as 1:2013cv10111
Defendant:
City of Pittsfield, Town of Lee, Town of Dalton and others
Plaintiff:
Michael O'Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Laughlin v. City of Pittsfield, et al
as 3:2013cv10111
Defendant:
City of Pittsfield, Town of Lee, Town of Dalton and others
Plaintiff:
Michael O'Laughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv09513
Plaintiff:
Michael Hill
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Porfirio Santiago and Ruben Reynoso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Fowler v. Michael Hill
as 12-10301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL FOWLER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL HILL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
