Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Hoglund v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2017cv00824
Plaintiff:
Keith Hoglund
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Edgar D Whitcomb, Mitch Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin Brecht v. Mark Kubinski, et al
as 14-35873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN BRECHT
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK KUBINSKI, Idaho Deputy Attorney General sued in individual and official capacity, PAUL PANTHER, Idaho Deputy Attorney General sued in individual and official capacity, LYNN MARTEN, Assistant Regional Commissioner for Social Security sued in individual and official capacity and others
Tate v. Astrue
as 2:2013cv02156
Plaintiff:
Johnny Tate
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sullivan v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00647
Plaintiff:
Joseph W. Sullivan
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Stuckey v. Astrue et al
as 1:2012cv03044
Plaintiff:
Andre Stuckey
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Social Sercurity Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Short v. Astrue et al
as 5:2010cv01078
Plaintiff:
Harvey Patrick Short
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Charles Crews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles E. Simms v. Social Security
as 11-7376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES SIMMS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner and UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Eline v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv01362
Plaintiff:
Paul H. Eline
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. Social Security Administration et al
as 8:2011cv01967
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Simms
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Michael J. Astrue and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bush v. Astrue
as 8:2010cv03105
Plaintiff:
Barbara M. Bush
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
