Cases 1 - 10 of 13
(PS) Greer v. Curry et al
as 2:2025cv00362
Plaintiff:
Javanna R. Greer
Defendant:
Mark Curry, Ramonn De Jesus, Alan Pineschi and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
JACQUES v. MAE et al
as 2:2022cv02806
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JACQUES
Defendant:
SALLIE MAE, JONATHAN W. WRITER and DANIEL KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
JACQUES v. SALLIE MAE
as 2:2022cv00703
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JACQUES
Defendant:
SALLIE MAE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
(PC) Jacques v. Brahney et al
as 2:2021cv00143
Defendant:
M. Brahney, J. Stratton and R. Reyes
Plaintiff:
Michael Jacques and Michael E. Jacques
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACQUES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv75284
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JACQUES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GARRETT v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03262
Plaintiff:
BRENT BERGENER, JIBRIEL STARKS, MICHAEL JACQUES and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garrett et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02250
Plaintiff:
Brent Bergener, Jibriel Starks, Michael Jacques and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Jacques v. Lopez, Jr. et al
as 1:2016cv01289
Plaintiff:
Michael Jacques
Defendant:
J. Lopez, Jr., T. Vasquez, P. Athie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell et al. v. Department of Child Support Services et al.
as 2:2016cv01197
Plaintiff:
Michael Powell, Tomery Darling, Livvy Powell and others
Defendant:
Department of Child Support Services, Superior Court of California Placer County, Dirk Amara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Michael Jacque
as 14-10797
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL JACQUES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
