Cases 1 - 10 of 11
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kendall v. Galindo et al
as 4:2023cv02709
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Kendall
Defendant:
Galindo, Lt. Uribe and Donna Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brower v. Charleston County et al
as 2:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Sonny Brower
Defendant:
Charleston County, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Kristin Graziano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Eisner v. Charleston County et al
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
Todd Eisner
Defendant:
Charleston County, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Kristin Graziano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
KENDALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv04117
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL KENDALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENDALL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32730
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL KENDALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Kendall
as 19-1465
Defendant / Appellant:
AARON MICHAEL KENDALL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The Northern Assurance Company v. Michael Kendall, et al
as 09-3790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
The Northern Assurance Company of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Kendall, Christopher Kendall, Edward Kendall and others
The Northern Assurance Company of America v. Kendall, et al.,
as 4:2009cv00171
Plaintiff:
The Northern Assurance Company of America and The Northern Assurance Company of America
Defendant:
Michael Kendall, Christopher Kendall and Edward Kendall
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
