Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Daniel Cohen et al v. Duane Hughes et al
as 2:2021cv08734
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cohen and David Cohen
Defendant:
Duane Hughes
Respondent:
Steve Schrader, Robert Willison, Raymond J. Chess and others
Cohen et al v. hughes et al
as 1:2021cv00601
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cohen and david cohen
Defendant:
duane hughes, Steve schrader, Robert Willison and others
David Brown et al v. Duane A. Hughes et al
as 2:2021cv04412
Defendant:
Duane A. Hughes, Workhorse Group Inc., Stephen Fleming and others
Plaintiff:
David Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mark Kistenmacher v. Duane A. Hughes et al
as 2:2021cv04294
Defendant:
Duane A. Hughes, Pamela S. Mader, Workhorse Group Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Kistenmacher
Barry Caruso v. Duane A. Hughes, et al
as 2:2021cv04202
Defendant:
Jacqueline Dedo, Harry DeMott, H. Benjamin Samuels and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Caruso
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mark Kistenmacher and David Brown
Cox v. Hoagland et al
as 3:2014cv00637
Plaintiff:
Daniel William Cox, Jr.
Defendant:
Kenny C. Hoagland, Ramon Pineroa, Michael L. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alshehabi v. Hymans Seafood Company Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02724
Plaintiff:
Alicia Alshehabi , Elisabeth A Germain , Daniel W Miller and others
Defendant:
Hymans Seafood Company Inc , Eli Hyman , Aaron Hyman and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv00538
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
CLARK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2008cv01420
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L. CLARK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
