Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Michael McCloud v. Cristella Rice
as 23-1004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MCCLOUD
Defendant / Appellee:
CRISTELLA RICE and NEWPORT NEWS REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING AUTHORITY
Defendant:
MARCIA L. FUDGE, Secretary of HUD, KELLY BRUNSON and STUART GARDENS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Blanton v. Aeroframe Services
as 22-30191
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ronald Blanton, Tom France, Dustin Gilley and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Aeroframe Services, L.L.C.
Defendant / Appellee:
Aviation Technical Services, Incorporated
Blanton v. Aviation Technical Services
as 21-30392
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Blanton, Tom France, Dustin Gilley and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Aviation Technical Services, Incorporated
McCloud v. Davis, et al
as 4:2021cv00015
Plaintiff:
Michael McCloud
Defendant:
D.B. Frye, Jr. and Thomas R. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
McCloud v. Rice,
as 4:2020cv00004
Defendant:
C. Rice
Plaintiff:
Michael McCloud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCloud et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2018cv02870
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth McCloud and Michael McCloud
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCLOUD v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv16971
Defendant:
IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC"), JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCCLOUD and MARGARET MCCLOUD
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MCCLOUD et al
as 5:2017cv00558
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KIM MCCLOUD and MICHAEL MCCLOUD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
Michael McCloud v. A. Funaiock
as 16-1951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCCLOUD
Defendant - Appellee:
A. M. FUNAIOCK
Defendant:
KAREN N. HENDERSON
Michael McCloud v. L. Jackson
as 15-1490
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCCLOUD
Defendant - Appellee:
L. JACKSON, Police Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
