Cases 41 - 50 of 77
Najera v. Murphy, et al
as 11-8047
Petitioner - Appellant:
FELIX NAJERA
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MURPHY, Warden, Wyoming Medium Correctional Institution and WYOMING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jerdine v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2011cv01013
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerdine
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Stacy Gwin, Donna Cambiero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Marcel Farrish
as 11-2045
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCEL RAYNARD FARRISH, a/k/a Marcel Raynard Farris a/k/a Michael Murphy
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Evans v. Murphy et al
as 4:2010cv01561
Plaintiff:
Regis LePaul Evans
Defendant:
Michael Murphy, Jack Roberts, Kalz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parkhurst v. Lampert, et al
as 10-8078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK R. PARKHURST
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT LAMPERT, Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections and MICHAEL MURPHY, Director, Wyoming Deparment of Corrections, in their official and individual capacities
Wright et al v. Polk County et al
as 4:2010cv00136
Plaintiff:
Brandon Ed Wright and Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
Polk County, Polk County Board of Commissioners, Haralson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Polk County et al
as 4:2010cv00133
Plaintiff:
Byron Scott Wright
Defendant:
Polk County, Polk County Board of Commissioners, Haralson County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodgers v. San Mateo County et al
as 5:2010cv01354
Plaintiff:
Russell Dwayne Rodgers
Defendant:
San Mateo County, San Mateo County Jail Board of Supervisor, Don Horsely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
