Cases 51 - 60 of 65
Purifoy v. Bauxite, City of et al
as 4:2012cv00742
Plaintiff:
Deborah Purifoy
Defendant:
Bauxite, City of, Michael Ray Turner, Ron Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
United States v. Justin Ray
as 11-3260
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Justin Michael Ray
Householder v. McClung et al
as 3:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Householder
Defendant:
Gerald McClung and Clay County Sheriff 's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. USA
as 4:2010cv00044
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Gamble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
United States v. Wade Duane Arvidson
as 09-3812
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Wade Duane Arvidson, also known as Michael Duane Damron, also known as Michael Ray Buringrud
United States v. Michael Smith
as 09-3405
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Ray Smith
Perry v. Miller et al
as 5:2009cv00309
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Perry
Defendant:
V Miller and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loften v. Ray et al
as 0:2009cv02152
Plaintiff:
James Loften and James Loften
Defendant:
Michael Ray, Michael Ray, Michael Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Type:
Other Statutes
United States of America v. American Fuel Cell and Coated Fabrics Company et al
as 1:2009cv01016
Defendant:
American Fuel Cell and Coated Fabrics Company and Zodiac Group, The
Plaintiff:
Danny Michael Ray and William Berry
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 373
Higgs v. Union County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 1:2008cv01092
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Higgs
Defendant:
Union County Criminal Justice Center, Ken Jones and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
