Cases 41 - 50 of 450
Miller v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02976
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Miller
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORINI v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23875
Plaintiff:
Michael Robert Morini and MICHAEL R MORINI
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harris v. Guardian Asset Management et al
as 3:2022cv01528
Plaintiff:
Roney Harris
Defendant:
Guardian Asset Management, Jerry Mavellia, HSBC Bank USA, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. BNSF Railway Co.
as 1:2022cv06441
Plaintiff:
Michael Roberts
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Co.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
RANZY v. SHAY
as 1:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
RASHAD C. RANZY
Defendant:
MICHAEL ROBERT SHAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Robert Battaglia v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv07716
Plaintiff:
Mr. MICHAEL ROBERT BATTAGLIA and Michael Robert Battaglia
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DALTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20090
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROBERT DALTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DOLENSKY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17411
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROBERT DOLENSKY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FORTE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17381
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROBERT FORTE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCCLURE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12599
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROBERT MCCLURE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
