Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DALMATIA IMPORT GROUP, INC. v. FOODMATCH, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02767
Plaintiff:
DALMATIA IMPORT GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
FOODMATCH, INC. , LANCASTER FINE FOODS, INC. , EARTH PRIDE ORGANICS, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
FOODMATCH, INC.
Counter_defendant:
DALMATIA IMPORT GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. USA
as 3:2009cv01030
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Thompson
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6702 IRS: Refund of Income Tax Penalty
King & Ballow v. Michael Thompson
as 09-6477
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KING & BALLOW
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. THOMPSON
KING & BALLOW v. THOMPSON
as 2:2009mc00203
Plaintiff:
KING & BALLOW
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Wetzel v. Hammond Police Department et al
as 2:2009cv00128
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Wetzel
Defendant:
Hammond Police Department, Hammond City, Gordan Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
King & Ballow v. Thompson
as 3:2008cv01024
Plaintiff:
King & Ballow
Defendant:
Michael S. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv06045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Thompson v. Town & Country Credit Corp.,
as 1:2007cv02770
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Thompson
Defendant:
Town & Country Credit Corp.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Thompson v. Town and Country Credit Corp. et al
as 1:2007cv00117
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Thompson
Defendant:
Town and Country Credit Corp and Ameriquest Mortgage Company
Counter Claimant:
Town and Country Credit Corp and Ameriquest Mortgage Company
Counter Defendant:
Michael S. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Thompson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2007cv00240
Plaintiff:
Michael S Thompson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
