Cases 1 - 10 of 16
McCarthy v. Meyer Shank Racing LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01305
Plaintiff:
Ryan McCarthy
Defendant:
Meyer Shank Racing LLC and Michael Shank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SHANK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33626
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHANK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHANK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv47205
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHANKS v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03362
Plaintiff:
GREGG BLANK and MICHAEL SHANKS
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander Diya, et al v. Warden Byrnes, et al
as 17-3210
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY ROY MARTIN
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DMOTOMIWA DIYA
Defendant:
MR. WARDEN BYRNES, JOHN D. SWIDER, Grievance Coordinator, TKC HOLDING and others
DIYA et al v. BYRNES et al
as 2:2017cv03536
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER DMOTOMIWA DIYA and TRACY ROY MARTIN
Defendant:
BYRNES, JOHN D. SWIDER, COMPANY OF KEEFE - TKC HOLDING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. SHANK et al
as 2:2016cv06504
Plaintiff:
MARVIN BANKS
Defendant:
MICHAEL SHANK, TOLBERT, FAKOLEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avendano v. Averus, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01614
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Avendano
Defendant:
Averus, Inc. and Michael Shank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv10282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
REESE v. GEORGE W. HILL PRISON et al
as 2:2008cv05987
Plaintiff:
GLENN E. REESE
Defendant:
GEORGE W. HILL PRISON, BETH CURRY, MICHAEL SHANK and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
