Cases 1 - 10 of 109
TRICE v. OMALLEY
as 5:2024cv01661
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHAWN TRICE
Defendant:
MARTIN OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States v. Michael McGuire
as 24-1706
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Shawn McGuire
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
US v. Michael Brown
as 23-7234
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL SHAWN BROWN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
ENGSTROM v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Michael Shawn Engstrom
Defendant:
Secretary Social Security and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
WELLS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13432
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHAWN WELLS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03514
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHAWN CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Harp v. Harris County District Attorney's Office
as 4:2023cv03438
Plaintiff:
Michael Shawn Harp
Defendant:
Harris County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00518
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SHAWN CLARK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
