Cases 31 - 40 of 1,256
In Re: Future Motion, Inc. Products Liability Litigation
as 5:2023md03087
Plaintiff:
James Loh, Sean Michael Smith, Giovany Rico and others
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc., ABC CORP 1-10, DEF CORP 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv02037
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail and Warden Christopher Schell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd Meador v. Smith
as 4:2023cv01209
Petitioner:
Laura Kristen Boyd Meador
Respondent:
US Department of Defense and Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Smith v. F&M Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01951
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
F&M Bank, Joy Heinbaugh, Todd A. Rock and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smith v. Perkins et al
as 2:2023cv01931
Plaintiff:
John Michael Smith
Defendant:
Richard Perkins, Todd L. Moody and Christina M. Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Armendariz Perez v. Warden Mr. Smith
as 4:2023cv01168
Petitioner:
Irene Armendariz Perez
Respondent:
Warden Mr. Smith and Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Tate Prows v. City of Oxford, OH, et al
as 23-3920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TATE DAVID PROWS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OXFORD, OH, CHIEF JOHN A. JONES, MICHAEL SMITH and others
Smith, Jr. v. Polk County Jail
as 4:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith and Michael Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Polk County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
