Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company v. Scott et al
as 2:2011cv01550
Plaintiff:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
David DeWayne Scott, Eliza Soto, Joann Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Johnson v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2011cv02481
Defendant:
Sean Comiskey, Sean P. Mcquaid, SCPD Headquarters and others
Plaintiff:
Chad S. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Ryan v. John Harlan, et al
as 11-35264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN NORMAN RYAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HARLAN, Probation Officer, CARL GOODMAN, Assistant Director, Mulnomah Co. Community Justice, Adult Services Division, KEVIN BOWERS, Community Justice Supervisor and others
Vineyard v. Soto et al
as 3:2010cv01481
Defendant:
Officer David Baker, Andrew Farris, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Taylor Lee Vineyard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryan v. Harlan et al
as 3:2010cv00626
Defendant:
Michael Anderson, Kevin Bowers, Carl Goodman and others
Plaintiff:
John Norman Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SOTO et al v. QUICKEN LOANS, INC. et al
as 3:2009cv04862
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SOTO and DESIREE COLLAZO-SOTO
Defendant:
QUICKEN LOANS, INC., YASHA ELIZAROV, TITLE SOURCE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
SOTO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv03367
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SOTO
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and SEAN STEWART
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Casarez et al v. Agrigenetics, Inc. et al
as 7:2007cv00261
Plaintiff:
Israel Casarez, Juan Diaz, Jr., Ismael Casarez and others
Defendant:
Agrigenetics, Inc. and Pablo Martinez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
DAVIS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2007cv00021
Plaintiff:
MARY E. DAVIS
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and MICHAEL SOTO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
