Cases 1 - 9 of 9
St. Clair v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00338
Petitioner:
Michael St. Clair
Respondent:
Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
St Clair v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00170
Plaintiff:
Michael St Clair
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
St. Clair v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01229
Plaintiff:
Michael St. Clair
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc. , FNU Drumm, FNU Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Acedo v. Superior Court of the State of California et al
as 3:2015cv02969
Plaintiff:
Daniel Acedo
Defendant:
Superior Court of the State of California, San Diego, County of, San Diego, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Keithroy Clarke
as 14-6983
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEITHROY NOEL CLARKE, a/k/a T, a/k/a Michael St. Clair Davis, a/k/a Tyrone Roberts, a/k/a Khadafi, a/k/a Capone
Michael St. Clair v. Larry May, et al
as 12-3711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael St. Clair
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry May, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, James Banks, Warden, Varner Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction and Louise Wells, Correctional Officer, Varner Supermax Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction
St Clair v. May et al
as 5:2012cv00262
Plaintiff:
Michael St Clair
Defendant:
Larry May, James Banks and Louise Wells
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walter Haynes, et al v. Larry May, et al
as 09-3368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Walter Haynes and Michael St. Clair
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry May, Deputy Assistant Director, ADC, David White, Deputy Warden, Maximum Security Unit, ADC, C. Woods, Nurse, Maximum Security Unit, ADC and others
Haynes et al v. May et al
as 5:2009cv00273
Plaintiff:
Walter Haynes and Michael St Clair
Defendant:
Larry May, David White, C Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
