Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Michael Stuart Vincent v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05316
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Stuart Vincent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Roberts v. Garland
as 23-28
Petitioner:
MICHAEL STUART ROBERTS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Stuart v. Warren County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 4:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
Michael Stuart
Defendant:
Warren County Sheriff's Dept., Eric Schleuter and Kristy Poe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stuart v. Great Lakes Insurance SE
as 0:2022cv60269
Plaintiff:
Michael Stuart
Defendant:
Great Lakes Insurance SE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
LONGACRE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02725
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STUART LONGACRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STUART v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv96322
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MICHAEL STUART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STUART v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv27466
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STUART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STUART v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00028
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL STUART
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SZYMKOWICZ v. FRISCH et al
as 1:2019cv03329
Defendant:
LAW PROFESSOR BLOGS, LLC and MICHAEL STUART FRISCH
Plaintiff:
JOHN PAUL SZYMKOWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
