Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Davison v. Mooney
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Davison
Defendant:
Edward C. Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davison v. Sidders et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Davison
Defendant:
Mattew Sidders, Jason R. Venable and Chrstine B. Joslin
Simmons v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Simmons
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Polzin et al v. Carrington Mortgage Services LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Lynn Marie Polzin and Michael Wade Bergstrom
Defendant:
Carrington Mortgage Services LLC and Jordan Elise Properties LLC
Moorish Science Temple of America et al v. Pallmeyer et al
as 2:2020cv10367
Defendant:
Edward Moody, Michael Wade, Thomas Bruton and others
Plaintiff:
Grand Sheik L. Love El, Asst. Grand Sheikess M.D. Love El and Moorish Science Temple of America doing business as Grand Sheik L. Love EL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2019cv01009
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Adams
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Adams v. Berryhill
as 2:2017cv01019
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Curl v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015at01034
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Curl
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Curl v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv02088
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade Curl
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Michael Wade v. City of San Bernardino et al
as 2:2011cv09831
Defendant:
Adam Affrunti, City of San Bernardino and Does
Plaintiff:
Michael Wade
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
