Cases 31 - 40 of 136
Agee et al v. Alphatec Spine, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00750
Defendant:
Alphatec Spine, Inc. and Parcell Laboratories, LLC
Plaintiff:
Michelle Agee , Gayle Bachman , Nick Battista and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Watkins v. Karl Storz Endoscopy-America Inc et al
as SC/3:15-cv-01585
Plaintiff:
Michael Watkins
Defendant:
Karl Storz Endoscopy-America Inc and Karl Storz GMBH & Co KG
Watkins v. Karl Storz Endoscopy-America Inc et al
as 3:2015cv01585
Plaintiff:
Michael Watkins
Defendant:
Karl Storz Endoscopy-America Inc, Karl Storz Endovision Inc and Karl Storz GMBH & Co KG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv08422
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Greg Adkisson, et al v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc
as 14-6207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREG ADKISSON, DONNA ADKISSON, LEONARD BLEDSOE and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN BERRY, GABRIEL BILLINGSLEY, J. R. REED and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00183
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Scott Smith v. Washington Department of Corre, et al
as 13-36064
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT C. SMITH, AKA Scott Isamu Michio Kikuchi
Defendant - Appellee:
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Adkisson et al v. Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (TV1)
as 3:2013cv00505
Plaintiff:
Greg Adkisson , Donna Adkisson , Dustin Berry and others
Defendant:
Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
