Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Cruzen v. Blocker et al
as 3:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Cruzen
Defendant:
Nathan Repp, Murphy Blocker and Michelle Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricketts v. Westwood Condo Assoc. et al
as 3:2023cv01079
Plaintiff:
Robert Ricketts
Defendant:
Westwood Condo Assoc., Francis Ogorman, Jonathan Chapel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
as 2:2023cv12032
Plaintiff:
Michele Anderson
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-288
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-41
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv05049
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michelle Anderson v. Andy Neyrick, et al
as 16-2246
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Michelle Anderson
Defendant - Appellant:
Andy Neyrick, Individually and employed by City of Davenport and Scott Crowe, Individually and employed by City of Davenport
Anderson et al v. Breithaupt et al
as 1:2015cv01067
Plaintiff:
Z. A. and Michelle Anderson
Defendant:
Charles Breithaupt, Jamey Harrison and University Interscholastic League (UIL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Constitutional Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
