Cases
MACK et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv05659
Plaintiff: MICHAEL SHANE VAUGHN, CAMERON SHIELDS, ARSENIO PELAYO and others
Defendant: MCKESSON CORPORATION, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Darrel's Place Inc et al
as 3:2019cv01988
Plaintiff: J & J Sports Productions Inc and G&G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant: George McCarthy, Donald Torrence, Darrel's Place Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
MACK et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02059
Plaintiff: MICHAEL SHANE VAUGHN, CAMERON SHIELDS, ARSENIO PELAYO and others
Defendant: MCKESSON CORPORATION, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mack et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2018cv04928
Plaintiff: Michael Shane Vaughn, Cameron Shields, Arsenio Pelayo and others
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simmons et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00468
Plaintiff: Dorothy Simmons , Debbie Barger , Jacqueline Betts and others
Defendant: Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as MOE/4:15-cv-00341
Plaintiff: Dorothy Simmons , Debbie Barger , Jacqueline Betts and others
Defendant: Skechers USA. Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Simmons et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00341
Plaintiff: Dorothy Simmons , Debbie Barger , Jacqueline Betts and others
Defendant: Skechers USA. Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?