Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Atkins v. Quesenberry et al
as 4:2026cv03035
Plaintiff:
Dotina Denise Atkins
Defendant:
Mickey Alan Quesenberry, BFS Asset Holdings, LLC and BFS Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Taylor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2026cv00155
Petitioner:
Mickey Ray Taylor
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2026cv00154
Petitioner:
Mickey Ray Taylor and Mickey Ray Taylor, Jr
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Integon National Insurance Company v. Robertson et al
as 5:2026cv00133
Plaintiff:
Integon National Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mickey Robertson, Stacia Robertson, Philip Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Lasisi v. Lyft Express Drive et al
as 1:2026cv01857
Plaintiff:
Shakira Lasisi
Defendant:
Lyft Express Drive, The Hertz Corporation, Lyft, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Assault, Libel, Slander
Atkinson v. Kent County Prosecutor's Office et al
as 1:2026cv01934
Plaintiff:
Derrek D. Atkinson
Defendant:
Kent County Prosecutor's Office, Nicole McMains, Ethan Mickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Russell v. State of Illinois Prisoner Review Board et al
as 1:2026cv07397
Plaintiff:
Mickey Russell
Defendant:
State of Illinois Prisoner Review Board and Stateville C.C. NRC
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Wood's et al
as 1:2026cv07350
Plaintiff:
Mickey Russell
Defendant:
Wood's, Hallaway, Laura and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. Officer Bond et al
as 1:2026cv07129
Plaintiff:
Mickey Russell
Defendant:
Officer Bond, Lt. Reed, SGT. Knocks and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
