Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Alvarez v. Regions Commercial Roofing, Inc.
as 4:2021cv04190
Counter Defendant:
Miguel A Alvarez
Counter Claimant:
Regions Commercial Roofing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALVAREZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv12724
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL A ALVAREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maria Jimenez et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2020cv01488
Plaintiff:
Maria Jimenez and Miguel Piedra-Alvarez
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Warren-Anderson Ford dba Fritts Ford and Warren-Anderson Ford a California Corporation doing business as Fritts Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Miguel Santacruz-Alvarez
as 16-41435
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL SANTACRUZ-ALVAREZ
United States v. Alvarez
as 15-6124
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL ALVAREZ
FAIR HOUSING CENTER OF CENTRAL INDIANA et al v. MH LEASING, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00817
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL CEBALLOS ALVAREZ, FAIR HOUSING CENTER OF CENTRAL INDIANA and ANA ROMAN
Defendant:
FR CHINOOK, LLC, FR COMMUNITY, LLC, MH LEASING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Alvarez et al v. Davies
as 1:2015cv00417
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Alvarez and Juan Rodas
Defendant:
Patrick Davies
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Juan Alvarez-Alvarez
as 14-40858
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN MIGUEL ALVAREZ-ALVAREZ
Alvarez v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00836
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Alvarez
Unknown:
Gerald Welt
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
USA v. Miguel Osuna-Alvarez
as 13-50636
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MIGUEL OSUNA-ALVAREZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
