Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Jackson v. Oklahoma State Penitentiary et al
as 6:2018cv00388
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Mike Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Carpenter
as 5:2018cv01149
Respondent:
Mike Carpenter
Petitioner:
Samuel Max Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stephens v. Carpenter et al.
as 1:2018cv02826
Respondent:
Brian Frosh, Terry Royal, Warden Dayena M. Corcoran and others
Petitioner:
Lee E. Stephens, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Knox v. Rowland et al
as 6:2018cv00287
Defendant:
J Whala, Sgt. Chad Morgan, Mack McManus and others
Plaintiff:
Antone Lamandingo Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v Carpenter
as 6:2018cv00279
Petitioner:
Antone Lamandingo Knox
Respondent:
Mike Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Knox v Carpenter
as 5:2018cv00756
Petitioner:
Antone Lamandingo Knox
Respondent:
Mike Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carpenter v. Sallisaw, City of
as 6:2017cv00042
Plaintiff:
Mike Carpenter
Defendant:
Sallisaw, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Harrison Tigrett, et al v. Robert Cooper, Jr., et al
as 14-5473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HARRISON KERR TIGRETT, REGINA SUGARMAN, RUSSELL SUGARMON and others
Plaintiff:
MAXINE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. COOPER, JR., TRE HARGETT, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF STATE: DIVISION OF ELECTIONS and others
Intervenor - Appellee:
TOWN OF ARLINGTON, CITY OF BARTLETT, TOWN OF COLLIERVILLE and others
Maley v. City of Garnett, Kansas, et al
as 12-3235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCUS A. MALEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF GARNETT, KANSAS, GARNETT, KANSAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, MIKE CARPENTER and others
Maley v. Garnett, Kansas, City of et al
as 2:2012cv02472
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Maley
Defendant:
Garnett, Kansas, City of, Garnett, Kansas Police Department, Mike Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
