Cases 31 - 40 of 76
Webb v. Office of Management & Budget (OMB) et al
as 3:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
Major Mike Webb doing business as Friends for Mike Webb (C00591537) also known as Major Mike Webb for Congress (H8VA08167) doing business as Major Mike Webb for APS Board and Major Mike Webb for Congress (H
Defendant:
META Platforms, Inc., Office of Management & Budget (OMB) and Facebook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
WEBB v. GARLAND
as 1:2022cv01595
Petitioner:
MIKE WEBB doing business as FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB doing business as MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR CONGRESS agent of ANGELS OF LIBERTY and MIKE WEBB Major doing business as FRIENDS FOR MIKE WEBB doing business as MAJOR MIKE WEBB FOR CONGRESS agent of ANGELS OF LIBERTY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Webb v. Kimmel, et al.
as 3:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Major Mike Webb doing business as Friends for Mike Webb (C00591537) agent of Major Mike Webb for Congress (H8VA08167) also known as Major Mike for VA also known as Mike Webb for APS Board agent of Major Mike Webb for APS Board, Major Mike for VA and Mike Webb for APS Board
Defendant:
WJLA TV, WUSA 9, James Christian Kimmel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Missouri et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2022cv01213
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri, State of Louisiana, Aaron Kheriaty and others
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Jennifer Rene Psaki, Vivek H. Murthy and others
Petitioner:
Judson Witham, Kimberly D Hogan, Mike Webb and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Samaruddin K Stewart, Henry Schwartz and Global Engagement Center
Amicus Curiae:
Alliance Defending Freedom, Buckeye Institute and Childrens Health Defense
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Connie Sampognaro
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
In re: Major Mike Webb
as 22-1422
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL DAVID WEBB, d/b/a Friends for Mike Webb, a/k/a Major Mike Webb for Congress
Webb v. Northam
as 3:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Major Mike Webb doing business as Friends for Mike Webb (C00591537) also known as Major Mike Webb for Congress (H8VA08167) and Major Mike Webb for Congress (H
Defendant:
Ralph Shearer Northam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
WEBB v. FERRIERIERO
as 1:2022cv00432
Plaintiff:
MIKE WEBB
Defendant:
DAVID FERRIERIERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Webb v. Federal Elections Commission (FEC)
as 3:2022cv00047
Petitioner:
Major Mike Webb doing business as Friends for Mike Webb (C00591537) also known as Major Mike Webb for Congress (H8VA08167) and Major Mike Webb for Congress (H
Respondent:
Federal Elections Commission (FEC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Webb v. Anthony Fauci
as 21-2394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DAVID WEBB, d/b/a Friends for Mike Webb, d/b/a Major Mike Webb for U.S. Congress (VA8), d/b/a Major Mike Webb for VA, d/b/a Major Mike Webb for APS Board
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY S. FAUCI, in official and individual capacities, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, ROCHELLE WALENSKY, in official and individual capacities and others
Major Mike Webb v. Fauci et al
as 3:2021cv00432
Petitioner:
Major Mike Webb d/b/a Friends for Mike Webb, Major Mike Webb for U.S. Congress (VA8), Major Mike Webb for VA and Major Mike Webb for APS Board and Major Mike Webb doing business as Friends for Mike Webb doing business as Major Mike Webb for U.S. Congress (VA8) doing business as Major Mike Webb for VA doing business as Major Mike Webb for APS Board
Respondent:
Anthony S. Fauci, National Institute for Allergy & Infectious Disease (NIAID), Rochelle Walensky and others
Defendant:
BIONTECH SE, Janssen Global Services, LLC, Jennifer R. Psaki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
