Cases 41 - 50 of 587
Shah v. Schulman et al
as 1:2022cv01445
Plaintiff:
Alpesh Shah
Defendant:
Daniel H. Schulman, John D. Rainey, Rodney C. Adkins and others
Nominal Defendant:
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Scott Moffett Investments L L C v. Great Lakes Insurance S E
as 2:2022cv05032
Plaintiff:
Scott Moffett Investments, LLC and Scott Moffett Investments L L C
Defendant:
Great Lakes Insurance S E
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
MOFFETT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16701
Plaintiff:
ESAU MOFFETT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maria Magliocchini et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04991
Plaintiff:
Steven Sharamitaro, Maria Magliocchini, Christie Magnus and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Moffett v. Jones County Court System et al
as 2:2022cv00100
Plaintiff:
Rodger Moffett
Defendant:
Jones County Court System, Others Currently Unknown, Jones County Chancery Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moffett v. Radtke
as 2:2022cv00705
Petitioner:
Michael M Moffett
Respondent:
Dylon Radtke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Magliocchini et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00777
Plaintiff:
Magliocchini, Steven Sharamitaro, Maria Magliocchini and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Magliocchini et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
Steven Sharamitaro, Maria Magliocchini, Christie Magnus and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
