Cases 1 - 10 of 586
Mithun Banerjee v. Rand Gelber
as 24-1198
Plaintiff:
MITHUN BANERJEE
Defendant:
JUDGE RAND LEWIS GELBER, ADMIN JUDGE SHERRI DEBRA KOCH, JUDGE JOHN CHRISTIAN MOFFETT and others
Williams v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Curtis Andrew Williams
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Tyrone Oliver, Michael W. Nail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moffett v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Casey D. Moffett
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walter Moffett v. Travis Haag, et al
as 24-1299
Plaintiff:
WALTER J.D. MOFFETT
Defendant:
TRAVIS HAAG and SHANON SCHMIDTKNECHT
Moffett et al v. USAA Casualty Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
KYLE DUNCAN MOFFETT and JULIA ANN MOFFETT
Defendant:
USAA Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Moffett v. Platform Chroma LLC
as 5:2024cv10295
Plaintiff:
Beatriz Moffett
Defendant:
Platform Chroma LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Banerjee v. Gelber et al
as 8:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Mithun Banerjee
Defendant:
Judge Rand Lewis Gelber, Admin Judge Sherri D. Koch, Judge John C. Moffett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fuller et al v. Jefferson County, Colorado
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH ANN PARADY, LAURA M. HODGSON, ROCHELLE M. HOFFMAN and others
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Colorado
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 47101 - Airport & Airway Improvement Act
Moffett v. Jaeger
as 2:2024cv00058
Petitioner:
Darius Darnell Moffett
Respondent:
Prairie du Chien Correctional Institution and Warden Peter J Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
