Cases 41 - 50 of 612
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Al Fayad v. Garland
as 23-60440
Petitioner:
Mohamad Al Fayad, Adam Mohamad Al Fayad and Maryam Semhat
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
ESTATE OF ABDALLAH EL DEEK et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ABDALLAH EL DEEK, HEND AL RISHANI, RIYAD EL DEEK and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00943
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Mohamad Rizal v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2270
Petitioner:
MOHAMAD RIZAL
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Idlibi v. Home Depot USA
as 1:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Idlib and Mohamad Idlibi
Defendant:
Home Depot USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Hachem et al v. Refinitiv US Organization LLC et al
as 1:2023cv21679
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Hachem and Sneaker Impact, Inc.
Defendant:
Refinitiv US Organization LLC and Refinitiv US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
