Cases 21 - 30 of 8,765
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
United States of America v. Kazkaz
as 2:2024mc50456
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Mohamed Kazkaz
Garcia Miranda v. BK Auto Repair & Collision LLC et al
as 1:2024cv03385
Plaintiff:
Milton Ismael Garcia Miranda
Defendant:
BK Auto Repair & Collision LLC doing business as BK Wash & Repair Center, Mohammed Awad and Mohammad Hassan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ex Parte Application of Patrick McKillen and Hume Street Management Consultants Limited et al
as 2:2024mc00062
Not Yet Classified:
Ex Parte Application of Patrick McKillen and Hume Street Management Consultants Limited
Petitioner:
Patrick McKillen and Hume Street Management Consultants Limited
Respondent:
Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber bin Mohammed bin Thani Al Thani
El Kassem v. NORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT dba BROWARD HEALTH et al
as 0:2024cv60752
Plaintiff:
Mohammed El Kassem
Defendant:
NORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT dba BROWARD HEALTH and Dr. Kathleen Joseph-McBean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
El Kassem v. North Broward Hospital District
as 0:2024cv60753
Plaintiff:
Mohammed El Kassem
Defendant:
NORTH BROWARD HOSPITAL DISTRICT dba BROWARD HEALTH, Dr. Kathleen Joseph-McBean and Dusan Dragovich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Elsaw v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv03658
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED ELSAW
Defendant:
MERRICK B GARLAND, Connie Nolan, Director UR M JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
