Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MOHAMMED v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv04700
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN DOE(S) 1 through 10, Officer JAMES CRUSEMIRE and others
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMED MOHAMMED and MOHAMMED MOHANNED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Ruszczyk v. Noor et al
as 0:2018cv02086
Defendant:
Janee Harteau, Matthew Thomas Harrity, Minneapolis, City of, The and others
Plaintiff:
John Ruszczyk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Colon et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv05470
Plaintiff:
Hector Bonilla, Edwin Colon, Jasmin Pacheco and others
Defendant:
Evelyn Encarnacion, Samet Gulu, John Doe #1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McIness v. Craig et al
as 2:2016cv13918
Defendant:
James Craig , City of Detroit and Mohamed Mohamed
Plaintiff:
Izell McIness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pabon et al v. City of New York et al
as 2:2015cv04550
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Mohamed Mohamed #18337, Officers John Doe #1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Pabon and Sylvester Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pabon et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04550
Defendant:
Police Officer Mohamed Mohamed #18337, Officers John Doe #1-5, Police Officer James Paris and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Pabon and Sylvester Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01674
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01118
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
