Cases 51 - 60 of 62
Spector v. Mondelez International Inc.
as 1:2015cv04298
Plaintiff:
Judy Spector
Defendant:
Mondelez International Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Foster Taft v. Nabisco et al
as 2:2015cv02685
Defendant:
Altria Group Inc, Does, General Mills and others
Plaintiff:
Foster Taft
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv07606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Quigley v. Mondelez Global, LLC et al (PLR1)
as 2:2014cv00075
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Lynn Quigley
Defendant:
Mondelez Global, LLC, Mondelez International, Inc. and Penske Truck Leasing Co. L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator Tracy Shaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quigley v. Mondelez Global, LLC et al (PLR1)
as 3:2014cv00335
Plaintiff:
Rachelle Lynn Quigley
Defendant:
Mondelez Global, LLC, Mondelez International, Inc. and Penske Truck Leasing Co., LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Tindall Corporation v. Mondelez International Inc.
as 1:2014cv05196
Plaintiff:
Tindall Corporation
Defendant:
Mondelez International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Tindall Corporation v. Mondelez International Inc.
as 3:2014cv00345
Plaintiff:
Tindall Corporation
Defendant:
Mondelez International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Monique Manchouck v. Mondelez International, Inc.
as 13-17029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONIQUE MANCHOUCK, as an individual, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL, INC., an Illinois corporation, DBA Nabisco
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
