Cases 1 - 10 of 41
David Patterson v. David Spence
as 24-6205
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. PATTERSON
Defendant:
DAVID SPENCE, JUDGE HARRELL, DALLAS ROSE and others
MOOTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv00809
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOOTS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patterson v. Spence et al
as 5:2023ct03250
Plaintiff:
David A. Patterson
Defendant:
David Spence, Judge Harrell, Dallas Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spencer v. Captain Blanton et al
as 3:2023cv00561
Plaintiff:
Randall Spencer
Defendant:
Captain Blanton, Lt. Tremble, Sergeant Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moots v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00050
Petitioner:
Mark Allan Moots
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rettig #307829 v. Tennyson et al
as 2:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Rettig #307829
Defendant:
Unknown Tennyson, Unknown Neun, Unknown Britton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Nines et al
as 1:2022cv01832
Plaintiff:
Travis Terry
Defendant:
Jeff Nines, COII Shaffer, COII Mootes and others
Interested Party:
Maryland Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Flowers v. Carter et al
as 3:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
Ernest M. Flowers
Defendant:
Major Carter, Capt. C. L. James, Sgt. Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOOTS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43239
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MOOTS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOOT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38195
Plaintiff:
REGGIE MOOT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
