Cases 21 - 30 of 165
Quinones-Mercado v. US, et al
as 20-2182
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF PUERTO RICO, FRANCES RIOS DE MORAN, US DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERMAN QUINONES-MERCADO, JR. and GERMAN JR. QUINONES-MERCADO
Moran v. Department of Corrections of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2020cv12195
Defendant:
Carol A. Mici and Department of Corrections of Massachusetts
Plaintiff:
Christian Moran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. Luk, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv12191
Plaintiff:
Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company
Defendant:
Luk, Inc., Guardian Ad Litem Matthew P. Moran, Jack Loiselle, Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moran et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2020cv12171
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Centurion, Helen Brady, Craig Valdez and others
Defendant:
William F. Galvin, Charles D. Baker, Jr. and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Da Graca, et al
as 20-2117
Interested Party:
OSVALDO MOTA, ANDREA JOY JAMES, LUCAS VALENTIM and others
Petitioner:
JOAO AMADO, FRED KAYITARE, CONROY LEWIS and others
Respondent:
THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff, STEVEN J. SOUZA, Superintendent Bristol County House of Corrections in his Official Capacity, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and others
Amesbury v. City of Pawtucket et al
as 1:2020cv00348
Defendant:
City of Pawtucket, J Hanley, David Moran and others
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party:
JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner:
MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent:
TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
STOKES v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00121
Defendant:
SARGEANT MORAN, PENOBSCOT COUNTY JAIL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CADETT and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI DWIGHT STOKES
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
