Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv23186
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Turner v. Cisneros
as 26-2051
Petitioner:
MOSES LEE TURNER
Respondent:
THERESA CISNEROS, Warden, et al
Pat Suarez v. Lee Wong Inc. et al
as 2:2026cv00642
Plaintiff:
Pat Suarez
Defendant:
Moses Lee, Lee Wong Inc. doing business as Lucky Car Wash and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Moses Lee Turner v. Theresa Cisneros
as 2:2025cv11162
Petitioner:
Moses Lee Turner
Respondent:
Theresa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sudduth v. Lowndes County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
Mose Lee Sudduth, Jr.
Defendant:
Lowndes County, Mississippi, Roger Coleman and North Atlantic Security Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. T-Mobile USA, Inc
as 3:2017cv03211
Plaintiff:
Moses Lee Smith
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. CITY OF WASHINGTON DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2017cv01613
Plaintiff:
MOSES LEE SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF WASHINGTON DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CITY OF COLUMBIA, COUNTY OF RICHLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moses Turner v. W. Sullivan
as 17-55724
Petitioner - Appellant:
MOSES LEE TURNER
Respondent - Appellee:
W. J. SULLIVAN, Warden of the California Correctional Institution, Tehachapi, California
Moses Smith v. Essex County Department of Wel, et al
as 16-1602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOSES LEE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF WELFARE and NEWARK PUBLIC WELFARE
SMITH v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2015cv02511
Plaintiff:
MOSES LEE SMITH
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
