Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Antoine v. Chavis et al
as 5:2013ct03043
Plaintiff:
Caudy C. Antoine, Jr.
Defendant:
Patsy Chavis, Michelle Smith, Mr. Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2011cv00558
Plaintiff:
Antoine Coleman
Defendant:
Scott A. Middlebrooks, Jorge Pastrana, Mr. Henger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ENLOW v. BEARD et al
as 2:2011cv00856
Plaintiff:
IDRIS ENLOW
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, SCI-MERCER, SUPT. HARLOW, DORINA VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terry Hendricks v. Powatan Corr. Center
as 10-7522
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY HENDRICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
POWATAN CORR. CENTER WARDEN/SUPERINTENDENT, sued in their individual and official capacities, MR. GRAHAM, Counselor, sued in their individual and official capacities, V. EVANS, L.T. and others
Hendricks v. Powatan Corr. Center Warden/Superintendent et al
as 2:2010cv00445
Plaintiff:
Terry Hendricks
Defendant:
Powatan Corr. Center Warden/Superintendent, Mr. Graham, V. Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West-Bey v. Wallace et al
as 2:2010cv00121
Plaintiff:
Jerome J. West-Bey
Defendant:
Carol F. Wallace, Mr. Graham and Mr. Chai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Cox et al
as 4:2009cv00108
Plaintiff:
Clifton J. Robinson
Defendant:
C Cox, Mr. Boyd and Mrs. Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mike Scott v. Gary Maynard
as 09-6023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIKE S. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY D. MAYNARD, J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, MR. MILLER and others
Davis v. Casket et al
as 4:2007cv00118
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Davis
Defendant:
Dale Casket and Mrs. Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Graham
as 1:2007cv03055
Petitioner:
Kevin Johnson
Respondent:
Mr. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
