Cases 1 - 9 of 9
McFarlane v. Joseph Holly et al
as 3:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Robert Mcfarlane
Defendant:
Joseph Holly, MR. M. Dunkle, MR. P. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCFARLANE v. JOSEPH HOLLY et al
as 2:2023cv02676
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MCFARLANE
Defendant:
JOSEPH HOLLY, MR. M. DUNKLE, MR. P. WOODS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parr v. Farmers Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02020
Plaintiff:
Mr. Carroll Parr and Carroll Parr
Defendant:
Farmers Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Watison v. Sarratt et al
as 1:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Mr. Williams, Mrs. Reeves, Mrs. Ashley Ackerman and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond King Belal Watison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watison v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 1:2019cv00088
Plaintiff:
Raymond Watison and Raymond
Defendant:
Herbert H. Slatery, III, State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bee v. Delbalso et al
as 3:2019cv01840
Respondent:
Hearing Examiner L. Jarvis, Mr. Carroll, C. Grifffin and others
Petitioner:
Jason Bee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Watison v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 2:2019cv02684
Plaintiff:
Raymond Watison and Raymond King Belal Watison
Defendant:
Herbert H. Slatery, III, Mr. Williams, State of Tennessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fox v. Mrs. Carrol
as 1:2013cv00959
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Fox
Defendant:
Mrs. Carrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schonwalder et al v. Burk et al
as 6:2011cv01192
Plaintiff:
Karl Alan Schonwalder and Karl Alan Schoenwalder
Defendant:
Frank Bonetti, Kimberly L. Burk, Michael Nikitenko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
