Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Lumpkin v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Virginia Department Of Corrections, Kemsy Bowles, K.T. Punturi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Mr. Honeycut
as 23-6931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. HONEYCUTT, Alexander Correctional Institute Warden, FARRISH, Unit Manager, TIMOTHY METCALF and others
Brett v. Biden et al
as 3:2023cv00533
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Jill Biden, Attorney General Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINA HAMPTON, DHO, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
Keel v. Waccamaw Mental Health et al
as 4:2022cv02973
Plaintiff:
Molly Keel
Defendant:
Waccamaw Mental Health, Mrs Johnson and Mr Fred Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
Meyers v. Ratliffe-Walker et al
as 7:2022cv00137
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Meyers
Defendant:
Warden Dana Ratliffe-Walker, Keith Kelly and Mrs. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aaron Cullison v. Mr. Johnson
as 20-7457
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. WIGGINS, Mental Health and MR. JOHNSON, Mental Health Psychiatrist
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AARON JOSEPH CULLISON
Cullison v. Johnson et al
as 3:2020cv00578
Defendant:
Mr. Johnson and Mr. Wiggins
Plaintiff:
Aaron Joseph Cullison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randolph v. South Central Regional Jail et al
as 2:2020cv00282
Defendant:
Officer Mr. Johnson and South Central Regional Jail
Plaintiff:
Kereem Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
