Cases 1 - 10 of 12
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Neisser v. Morgan et al
as 8:2018cv02121
Respondent:
Mr. Morgan and Maryland Attorney General
Petitioner:
Drew David Neisser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DeVinche Albritton v. Edward Wright
as 15-8041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVINCHE ALBRITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD WRIGHT, Warden of Lawrenceville Correctional Center, MR. MORGAN, Former Unit Manager of 30 building, MS. BACON, Former counselor of 30 building and others
Degene Bell v. M.D. Anand et al
as 5:2012cv02135
Defendant:
M.D. Anand, Anderson, -, T. Busby and others
Plaintiff:
Degene Bell
Albritton v. Wright et al
as 2:2012cv00233
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon Albritton
Defendant:
Edward Wright, Mr. Morgan, Ms. Bacon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Huff v. Dr Franklin Grossman et al
as 5:2012cv00214
Defendant:
Timothy Busby, Dr. Franklin Grossman, RN Herrington and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Huff
Martin Avila v. Edgefield Federal Prison
as 11-7297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTIN AVILA
Defendant - Appellee:
EDGEFIELD FEDERAL PRISON, MARY MITCHELL, Warden, ACOSTA, Assist Warden and others
Welch v. Mr. Morgan et al
as 2:2010cv00736
Plaintiff:
Eric A. Welch
Defendant:
Mr. Morgan, Mr. Rowan, Gene Hatcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Charlotte Correctional Institution Employees et al
as 2:2010cv00547
Plaintiff:
Jonathan K. Lewis
Defendant:
Charlotte Correctional Institution Employees, A. Tomlinson, Mr. Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Cook County Dept. of Correction Jail et al
as 1:2009cv08004
Plaintiff:
Donyiell T. Brown
Defendant:
Cook County Dept. of Correction Jail, Mr. Prindle, Mr. Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
