Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Woodson v. Dye et al
as 7:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. T. Dye, Ms. Sater, Mr. Widener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, ASSOCIATE WARDEN, TODD E. ISHEE, BRADESHAWN HARRIS, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR and others
Hinson v. Gallam et al
as 8:2023cv01724
Plaintiff:
Clyde Allen Hinson
Defendant:
Nick Gallam, Mr. Hunt and Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
MEYERS v. GERNEGEN et al
as 1:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. VALRUS GERNEGEN, MR. MARCUS SCOTT, CAPTAIN MR. INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2022cv01096
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, TODD ISHEE, BRADESHAWN HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. GERNEGEN et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. BALRUS PERRIGAN GERNEGEN, MARCUS SCOTT, CAPTAIN MR. INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAFEEZ et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
SGT. MR. HAFEEZ, SGT. MR. HUNT, OFFICER MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2022cv00804
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, NCDPS PRISONS INTERSTATE COMPACT ADMINISTRATOR, SCOTLAND COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
REGINA HAMPTON, DHO, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
David Meyers v. Regina Hampton
as 22-6831
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, MS. NEALLY, Sergeant, MR. COVINGTON, Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
