Cases 1 - 10 of 13
TALBERT v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv02255
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MR. LITTLE, MR. COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lornes v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv02730
Plaintiff:
William Lee Lornes
Defendant:
Johnson, White, Donald Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruffin v. Little et al
as 1:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
David Ruffin
Defendant:
Mr. Little, Assistant Warden, Violence Reduction Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robledo-Valdez v. Hansen et al
as 1:2021cv03014
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Robledo-Valdez and C. S. Robledo
Defendant:
Warden Terry Jaques, Travis Marler, carolyn hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskins v. Bartolotti et al
as 3:2021cv00664
Defendant:
C. Heck, Mr. Adams, Mr. Spiller and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Newkirk v. Artisha Gregg
as 16-6623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant - Appellee:
ARTISHA GREGG, Hampton Commonwealth of Virginia, MR. HUFF, Chief Judge, MR. DECKER, Judge and others
Kelley v. Buscher et al
as 3:2014cv00512
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kelley
Defendant:
J. Buscher, Mr. Little and D. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornelius Carter v. Hegganstaller, et al
as 14-2931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORNELIUS CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. HEGGANSTALLER, Corrections Officer, MR. BECKER, Corrections Officer and MR. LITTLE, Corrections Officer
Lumbus v. Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2013cv01221
Plaintiff:
Brian Lumbus, Jr.
Defendant:
Cuyahoga County Sheriff's Department, Mr. Harris, Mr. Kaleta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Doe(s) et al
as 5:2012cv00037
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lee Griffin
Defendant:
John Doe(s), Matthew Critton, Mr. Caudell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
