Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CHAPPELL v. PERSICHILLI et al
as 2:2023cv01744
Plaintiff:
FLADGER T. CHAPPELL
Defendant:
COMM. JUDITH PERSICHILLI, GOV. PHIL MURPHY, DEPT. OF CORR. OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demache v. Hong et al
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Ali Charaf Demache
Defendant:
Mr Y. Hong, Ms Smith and Mr Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Booker v. Hudgins et al
as 3:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Mr. M. Wilson, Mr. Y. Hong and Robert Hudgins
Plaintiff:
Derrick J. Booker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pennington Bey v. Hudgins et al
as 5:2021cv00061
Defendant:
Mr. Y. Hong, Robert Hudgins and M. Wilson
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Pennington Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leonard Carter, Jr. v. Henry Hudson
as 17-6632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD CARTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. A. DAVID ROBINSON, Commonwealth of Virginia Chief Corrections Operations, MR. BRYAN WATSON, Commonwealth of Virginia The Virginia Department of Corrections, MR. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commonwealth of Virginia Director for the Virginia Department of Corrections and others
McCoy v. Buncich et al
as 2:2014cv00355
Plaintiff:
Keith McCoy
Defendant:
John Buncich, Mr Mark Kalusinski, Mrs Gentry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto v. Di Nico's Pizza Berwyn, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv04596
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Soto and Erculano Soto
Defendant:
Di Nico's Pizza Berwyn, Inc., Mr. X known as John and Mr. Y known as Mario
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Freire-Perez et al v. Hospital HIMA San Pablo de Bayamon et al
as 3:2013cv01171
Plaintiff:
Daniel Freire-Perez , Rebeca Negron , Conjugal Partnership Freire-Negron and others
Defendant:
Hospital HIMA San Pablo de Bayamon, Anabelle Perez-Rosario, Mr. X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Y. et al v. Suffield Board of Ed
as 3:2012cv01027
Defendant:
Suffield Board of Ed
Plaintiff:
Mr. Y. and Mrs. Y.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
