Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hollister v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv10664
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Officer Butler, Ms. Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Paul Hollister, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. State of Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00380
Defendant:
Mr Adams, Ms Craft, Ms Root and others
Plaintiff:
Calesha M. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kimble v. Sterner et al
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Glay Kimble
Defendant:
Ms. Sterner and Ms. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malcolm Muhammad v. Ms. Allen
as 23-6388
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MALCOLM MUHAMMAD
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. ALLEN, Medical Regional Admininstrator
Defendant:
ASSISTANT WARDEN WHITE, I. T. GILMORE, Warden, J. ADAMS, Unit Manager and others
Wilson, Jr v. Cohen et al
as 9:2023cv01510
Plaintiff:
John Ervin Wilson, Jr
Defendant:
Levern Cohen, Terrie Wallace, Consonya Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kimes v. Randolph et al
as 3:2021cv00124
Defendant:
Alma Martinez, Randolph, SGT Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth K. Kimes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hoskins v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv06943
Defendant:
Mr. Walsh, Ms. Allen, Tom Dart and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yahweh v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2020cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yeshua Emanuel Yahweh, Robert Gabriel Love, Gabriel Alexander Antonio and others
Defendant:
Ms. Ansah, Foe Two, Carl K. Kester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baltas v. Clarke et al
as 7:2020cv00276
Defendant:
Francis Stanley, Harold W. Clarke, A Mullins and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Baltas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Gilmore et al
as 1:2020cv00279
Defendant:
J. Adams, E. Witt, Ms. Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
