Cases 1 - 10 of 12
James Dailey v. Fleming, et al
as 23-12048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. FLEMING, LT. SPADES and MS. BRYANT
Jones v. Davis et al
as 1:2023cv01291
Plaintiff:
Bryan L Jones and Vizion
Defendant:
Ms. Davis, Mr. Jones, Ms. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00849
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Joshua Barlow v. Warden, et al
as 22-12506
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ARLINGTON BARLOW
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN, Reidsville State Prison, MS. SHARPE, Unit Manager, Reidsville State Prison, MR. SPIN, Unit Manager, Reidsville State Prison and others
BARLOW v. BOBITT et al
as 7:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ARLINGTON BARLOW
Defendant:
Warden BOBITT, Ms SHARPE, Mr SPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAILEY v. FLEMING et al
as 4:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Defendant:
Mr FLEMING, Lieutenant JAMES, JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Westley v. Harris et al
as 4:2021cv01672
Plaintiff:
James Westley
Defendant:
Warden Brandeshawn Harris, Warden LaShann Eppinger, Michael Beebe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Superintendent Desadier et al
as 1:2020cv00682
Plaintiff:
Leroy Jones
Defendant:
Ms Bryant, H Reed, Major L Armstrong #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DYER v. DILLS et al
as 1:2020cv00075
Defendant:
MS BROWN, MS BRYANT, MR ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D DYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNeal v. Bryant et al
as 3:2018cv01468
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Dr. Obadina, Mr. Malanot and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond McNeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
