Cases 1 - 10 of 16
David Meyers v. Mr. Honeycut
as 23-6931
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. HONEYCUTT, Alexander Correctional Institute Warden, FARRISH, Unit Manager, TIMOTHY METCALF and others
David Meyers v. Ms. Marshall
as 23-6806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. MARSHALL, American with Disabilities Act Coordinator, MS. COX, Medical Department Supervisor, MAILROOM STAFF and others
Wells v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Leroy Lamont Wells
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Oregon Department of Corrections, DSG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Mr. Burzinski et al
as 8:2023cv01336
Plaintiff:
Darryl Douglas Bradley, Jr
Defendant:
Mr. Burzinski, Mr. Kimbrell, Mr. Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Porterfield v. Shelby County Crim. Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02528
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Crim. Justice Center, Floyd Bonner, Jr., Mr. Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. Shelby County Criminal Justice Center et al
as 2:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
Issac Porterfield
Defendant:
Shelby County Criminal Justice Center, Dr. O. Webb, Dr. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Neagle et al
as 5:2018ct03148
Plaintiff:
Gregory G. Brown
Defendant:
B. Neagle, A. Frangiosa, Ms. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beasley v. Cox et al
as 6:2016cv00411
Plaintiff:
Jerry A. Beasley, Sr
Defendant:
Ms. Cox and Steve Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley v. Cox
as 6:2016cv00379
Plaintiff:
Jerry A. Beasley, Sr
Defendant:
Ms. Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
