Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Briggs v. Unknown Defendants
as 1:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Damian Briggs
Respondent:
Unknown Defendant(s), Ms Hawkins, Cpt Trotman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jasmaine f/k/a Duane LeRoy Fox v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2020ct03159
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ann Jasmaine f/k/a Duane LeRoy Fox
Defendant:
Mr. Thomas, Ms. Hawkins and Ms. Hargrove
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jasmaine f/k/a Duane LeRoy Fox v. Hawkins et al
as 5:2020ct03027
Defendant:
Mr. Key, Ms. Hawkins and Mr. Baxter
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Ann Jasmaine f/k/a Duane LeRoy Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Seelig v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 19-6445
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. STREETER, MR. HARVEY, LIEUTENANT HALL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL E. SEELIG
Seelig v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2018ct03206
Defendant:
Ms. Hawkins, Ms. West, Mr. Kearney and others
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Seelig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seelig v. Lassiter et al
as 5:2018ct03189
Defendant:
Mr. Stocks, Mr. Dawson, Mr. Hunter and others
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Seelig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Williams et al
as 2:2015cv00581
Plaintiff:
Jermild M Robinson
Defendant:
Mr Williams, Mr Rhodes, Mr Odom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alex v. Martus et al
as 1:2015cv00085
Plaintiff:
Deverick Christopher Alex
Defendant:
Officer Martus, Officer Richard, Ms Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Parker v. Moses Jackson, III
as 14-2565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald Parker
Defendant - Appellee:
Moses Jackson, III, Captain, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Mike Beebe, Governor of Arkansas, Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Simon v. Williams et al
as 1:2013cv01607
Plaintiff:
James Simon
Defendant:
Ms. Williams, Mr. Ganghan, Mr. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
