Cases 1 - 10 of 15
JONES, II v. EVANS et al
as 2:2022cv01744
Petitioner:
ANTHONY W. JONES, II
Defendant:
MR. EVANS, MS. NELSON, ATTORNEY GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roshune Carelock v. Jeff Johnson
as 22-1352
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROSHUNE LEMARR CARELOCK
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF JOHNSON, LYNETTE PATTON, WILLIAM BARNES and others
Defendant:
TRACY BLACK, NATALIE GAMBLE, MR. CHARLES and others
Riddle v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2021cv00343
Plaintiff:
Dion Edward Riddle
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Ms. Banks, Kayla M. Albrition and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reaves v. Rossman et al
as 3:2021cv01282
Plaintiff:
Nyheim Reaves
Defendant:
Jennifer Rossman, Curtis Grice, Ms. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENARD v. MANSI et al
as 2:2021cv02130
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GUY MENARD
Defendant:
PATRICIA CURRANT, CAROLINE CINQUANTO, CORIE FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charlie Bells, Jr. v. C. Rivers, et al
as 21-1882
Defendant / Appellee:
ANN ASH, Doctor, C. RIVERS, MS. NELSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE B. BELLS, JR.
Nichols v. Mr. McTighe et al
as 4:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Ms. Vines, Harlan Trombley, Mr. Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Dennis Nichols
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carelock v. Palmer et al
as 5:2020cv01833
Defendant:
Tiffany Jones, Jason Miles, Sharon Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Roshune Lemarr Carelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carelock v. Johnson et al
as 5:2020cv01635
Defendant:
Tiffany Jones, Lynnette Patton, Sharon Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Roshune Lemarr Carelock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 17-1105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TERRY C. HENDRIX
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, RICK RAEMISCH, SEAN FOSTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
