Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Burgess v. Dotson et al
as 7:2026cv00368
Plaintiff:
Earl Dushawn Burgess
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Joseph Walters, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laboy v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2026cv11372
Plaintiff:
Maria Laboy
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clayton Felton v. Mr. Clark
as 26-6257
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON LEE FELTON
Defendant:
MR. CLARK, SAMs Pod Boss, MRS. SPEARMAN, SAMs Pod Mental Health, MS. CURRY, Counselor/SAMs Pod and others
LABOY v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv01263
Plaintiff:
EDNA LABOY
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA LLC and PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Laboy Rivera v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 0:2026cv01325
Plaintiff:
Krizia L. Laboy Rivera
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
LABOY et al v. GEICO SECURE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2026cv00889
Plaintiff:
ZIYANNIE LABOY and EMILQUIADES SANCHEZ
Defendant:
GEICO SECURE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Vega-Cruz v. Superintendent Vicente et al
as 3:2025cv01660
Plaintiff:
Carlos Vega-Cruz
Defendant:
Superintendent Vicente, Officer Serrano and Officer Laboy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv04206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
MONTANEZ LABOY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2025cv16292
Plaintiff:
NACHIRA MONTANEZ LABOY and EDGARDO ORTIZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA doing business as UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
